[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-17873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17599087#comment-17599087
]
Blake Eggleston commented on CASSANDRA-17873:
---------------------------------------------
Seems reasonable yes, I can't think of a reason we'd want to keep it at the old
value
> Opcodes.ASM7 should be used in UDFByteCodeVerifier to support JDK11
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-17873
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-17873
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Build, Dependencies, Feature/UDF
> Reporter: Ekaterina Dimitrova
> Assignee: Ekaterina Dimitrova
> Priority: Normal
> Fix For: 4.0.x, 4.1-rc, 4.1.x, 4.x
>
>
> In CASSANDRA-15108 ASM was updated and UDFByteCodeVerifier was updated to
> provide Opcodes.ASM7 but only in 1 of 3 places.
> We need to update that for 4.0, 4.1 and trunk where we support JDK11.
> Also, I think it will be good to add one place where we update that when we
> add new JDK support as now I see we will have to update it at 4 places at
> least already (also for the simulator where currently it is Opcodes.ASM7
> there, correctly added). Also, we can add a note in build.xml for people
> updating ASM. I think many people practice updating Opcodes.ASM* with the
> update of ASM version but in our case with update of JDK, from what I see. We
> will need to switch to ASM9 when we add the JDK 17 support. One stop place
> for that and adding a note for maintainers sounds like the right way to move
> forward at least on trunk.
> But for 4.0 and 4.1 we need at least to switch to ASM7 everywhere as far as I
> can tell.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
