[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17708060#comment-17708060
 ] 

Jordan West commented on CASSANDRA-18352:
-----------------------------------------

Pushed the renaming requested by [~adelapena] and kicked off new test runs that 
are running now. 

 

[j8|https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/jrwest/cassandra/160/workflows/5d438432-7ca7-4819-ba7b-c787caa1e2a7]

[j11|https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/jrwest/cassandra/160/workflows/3d3e02fc-7ffc-4a7f-adcc-053a1d29f100]
 

> Add Option to Timebox write timestamps
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-18352
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18352
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: CQL/Semantics
>            Reporter: Jordan West
>            Assignee: Jordan West
>            Priority: Normal
>
> In several cases it is desirable to have client provided timestamps generated 
> at the application-level. This can be error prone, however. In particular, 
> applications can choose timestamps that may be nonsensical for a given 
> application. One dangerous manifestation of this is the "doomstone" (a 
> tombstone far in the future of any realistic write). This feature would allow 
> either operators or users to specify a minimum and maximum timebound of 
> "reasonable" timestamps. The default would be negative infinity, positive 
> infinity to maintain backwards compatibility. Writes that are USING TIMESTAMP 
> with a timestamp outside of the timebox will see an exception. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to