[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17708606#comment-17708606
 ] 

Jordan West commented on CASSANDRA-18352:
-----------------------------------------

Addressed review comments from [~adelapena] (thanks!). New test runs running 
now and linked below:

 

[j8|https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/jrwest/cassandra/161/workflows/75522b14-eab8-4162-8027-131aac728420]

[j11 
|https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/jrwest/cassandra/161/workflows/efbd9663-b753-43e4-b456-26776d72ef7c]

> Add Option to Timebox write timestamps
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-18352
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18352
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: CQL/Semantics
>            Reporter: Jordan West
>            Assignee: Jordan West
>            Priority: Normal
>          Time Spent: 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> In several cases it is desirable to have client provided timestamps generated 
> at the application-level. This can be error prone, however. In particular, 
> applications can choose timestamps that may be nonsensical for a given 
> application. One dangerous manifestation of this is the "doomstone" (a 
> tombstone far in the future of any realistic write). This feature would allow 
> either operators or users to specify a minimum and maximum timebound of 
> "reasonable" timestamps. The default would be negative infinity, positive 
> infinity to maintain backwards compatibility. Writes that are USING TIMESTAMP 
> with a timestamp outside of the timebox will see an exception. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to