Akshat-Jain opened a new pull request, #16804:
URL: https://github.com/apache/druid/pull/16804

   ### Description
   
   This PR fixes query correctness issues for MSQ window functions when using 
more than 1 worker (that is, `maxNumTasks > 2`).
   
   Currently, we were keeping the shuffle spec of the previous stage when we 
didn't have any partition columns for window stage. This PR changes it to 
return MixShuffleSpec so that the window stage gets a single partition to work 
on.
   
   Corresponding changes are done to propagate the MixShuffleSpec to the 
relevant query kits.
   
   A test has been added for a query which returned incorrect results prior to 
this change when using more than 1 workers.
   
   <hr>
   
   This PR has:
   
   - [x] been self-reviewed.
   - [ ] added documentation for new or modified features or behaviors.
   - [ ] a release note entry in the PR description.
   - [ ] added Javadocs for most classes and all non-trivial methods. Linked 
related entities via Javadoc links.
   - [ ] added or updated version, license, or notice information in 
[licenses.yaml](https://github.com/apache/druid/blob/master/dev/license.md)
   - [x] added comments explaining the "why" and the intent of the code 
wherever would not be obvious for an unfamiliar reader.
   - [x] added unit tests or modified existing tests to cover new code paths, 
ensuring the threshold for [code 
coverage](https://github.com/apache/druid/blob/master/dev/code-review/code-coverage.md)
 is met.
   - [ ] added integration tests.
   - [ ] been tested in a test Druid cluster.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to