[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-1860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17375484#comment-17375484
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on HUDI-1860:
--------------------------------------
Samrat002 commented on pull request #3184:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/3184#issuecomment-874086074
@codope
I have added the tests for both `INSER_OVERWRITE` and
`INSERT_OVERWRITE_TABLE` .
please review ^
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
> Add INSERT_OVERWRITE support to DeltaStreamer
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HUDI-1860
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-1860
> Project: Apache Hudi
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Sagar Sumit
> Assignee: Samrat Deb
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Original Estimate: 72h
> Remaining Estimate: 72h
>
> As discussed in [this
> RFC|https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HUDI/RFC+-+14+%3A+JDBC+incremental+puller],
> having full fetch mode use the inser_overwrite to write to sync would be
> better as it can handle schema changes.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
