ccollins476ad commented on a change in pull request #279: BLE Host - Policy for
SM key overflow
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mynewt-core/pull/279#discussion_r119369396
##########
File path: net/nimble/host/include/host/ble_store.h
##########
@@ -31,6 +31,12 @@ extern "C" {
#define BLE_STORE_OBJ_TYPE_PEER_SEC 2
#define BLE_STORE_OBJ_TYPE_CCCD 3
+/** Failed to persist record; insufficient storage capacity. */
+#define BLE_STORE_EVENT_OVERFLOW 1
+
+/** About to execute a procedure that may fail due to overflow. */
+#define BLE_STORE_EVENT_OVERFLOW_NEXT 2
Review comment:
I wasn't sure if this event would be used for other record types as well
(not just bonds). Since the first one (OVERFLOW) is used for multiple record
types, I opted to keep both generic.
I do agree BONDING is more clear. However, my only concern is that we'll
have to rename it again (change the API) if we want to use it for other record
types in the future.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
With regards,
Apache Git Services
