[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14992826#comment-14992826
]
Joseph Witt commented on NIFI-1099:
-----------------------------------
Oleg I think we need to make sure the interrupt status is reset by the
executor. And sweep to ensure we had no goofy caller code. As I wrote I
believe I agree it is always safe but let's be sure we understand the executor
behavior. I would not want the fact that a thread was ever interrupted to
linger.
> Interrupted status is not restored
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: NIFI-1099
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1099
> Project: Apache NiFi
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.3.0
> Reporter: Oleg Zhurakousky
> Assignee: Oleg Zhurakousky
> Fix For: 0.4.0
>
>
> There are few places with code that looks like this
> {code}
> try {
> Thread.sleep(val);
> } catch (InterruptedException ie) {
> }
> {code}
> . . . and the interrupted status of the thread is not restored. Need at the
> very least
> {code}
> Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
