ivan95603 commented on PR #12347:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/12347#issuecomment-2113477600
> > @ivan95603 yes, the new sensor driver use the uorb standard, it is a
standardized way to read from sensors, normally the old char device sensor are
specific for each sensor, it means if you replace your sensor with a new model,
you need to rewrite your application. Using uorb we avoid this issue. I think
we could change the sensor fusion example to use uorb.
>
> uorb is completely optional, this new sensor framework can be used just
like character device with a standard interface for all sensors. I have
prepared a simple app that uses the new sensor interface and sends data over
nxscope and then we can visualize the data on host. {his app doesn't relay on
uorb so it could be a good example of how to use the new framework without uorb.
Hi @raiden00pl and @acassis,
Thanks @raiden00pl.
If you agree I would like to create firstly something like an IMU uorb
simple example app that can simply explain whenever someone needs: just how to
get the data from IMU sensors quickly and print it in the app and later I would
create additional demo with Madgwick Fusion algorithm that is in Nuttx libs for
uorb sensors.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
