patacongo commented on a change in pull request #1380:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/1380#discussion_r451207373
##########
File path: arch/arm/src/stm32f7/stm32_tickless.c
##########
@@ -988,22 +988,31 @@ int up_timer_start(FAR const struct timespec *ts)
}
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_TICKLESS_ALARM
int up_alarm_start(FAR const struct timespec *ts)
{
uint64_t tm = ((uint64_t)ts->tv_sec * NSEC_PER_SEC + ts->tv_nsec) /
NSEC_PER_TICK;
- uint64_t counter = ((uint64_t)g_tickless.overflow << 32) |
- STM32_TIM_GETCOUNTER(g_tickless.tch);
-
- g_tickless.last_alrm = tm;
+ irqstate_t flags;
- int32_t diff = tm / NSEC_PER_TICK + counter;
+ flags = enter_critical_section();
STM32_TIM_SETCOMPARE(g_tickless.tch, CONFIG_STM32F7_TICKLESS_CHANNEL, tm);
stm32_tickless_ackint(g_tickless.channel);
stm32_tickless_enableint(CONFIG_STM32F7_TICKLESS_CHANNEL);
+ g_tickless.pending = true;
+
+ uint64_t counter = ((uint64_t)g_tickless.overflow << 32) |
+ STM32_TIM_GETCOUNTER(g_tickless.tch);
+
+ if (counter > tm)
+ {
+ stm32_interval_handler();
Review comment:
> So I need a safe way of expiring the timer, from within, the
up_alarm_start call, such that the work immediately just keeps moving. Am I
making any sense?
This would probably require some new design.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
