Donny9 commented on PR #15525: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15525#issuecomment-2591772912
@ > > @linguini1 that's the biggest problem with this new framework - there is absolutely no documentation :( and I know that without proper documentation, it's inappropriate to ask contributors to write drivers based on this new framework. > > Just a little elbow grease is all! From what I had seen when I checked it out earlier, it does appear to be a very powerful tool. My rocketry team particularly likes the ability to create fake sensors for mocking our applications, so for us I suppose the extra work would be worth it. Once I get some kind of an understanding I would be happy to contribute a little documentation on the subject if it makes it easier for the next developer. > > > The best source of knowledge at this point is the code (interface in `include/nuttx/sensors/sensor.h` is nicely described) and all sensors implemented in this way (`/drivers/sensors/XXXX_uorb.c`). At this moment there is no thermocouple ICs supported this way, so most likely the interface itself needs to be extended. > > Sounds excellent, thank you for the pointers! I will have a look at implementing this! @linguini1 hello, you can know everything about uorb and new sensor driver model by doc, PR https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15557 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
