Fix-Point commented on PR #17308: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/17308#issuecomment-3530557528
I have two main concerns: 1. You expect the expired timer to be triggered immediately, but your timer is delayed by one tick. What's the difference between this and the original implementation? 2. Each `wd_start` requires an extra `clock_systime_ticks()`, resulting in an extra `~50` CPU cycles overhead. Can you provide test data to prove that your patch will not cause a performance decrease? To address this issue, I'm working on a better solution. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
