linguini1 commented on code in PR #17011: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/17011#discussion_r2701297629
########## sched/clock/delay.c: ########## @@ -56,6 +56,19 @@ * Pre-processor Definitions ****************************************************************************/ +#if (CONFIG_BOARD_LOOPSPERMSEC == 0) && \ + !(defined(CONFIG_ALARM_ARCH) || defined(CONFIG_TIMER_ARCH)) Review Comment: Okay. I actually didn't check if `delay.c` gets bundled when these two are enabled. That makes sense! I guess that resolves my question on your other comment then; we can remove the `weak_function` too. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
