tito97sp commented on code in PR #7400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/7400#discussion_r1002766985
##########
boards/arm/stm32h7/nucleo-h743zi/src/stm32_boot.c:
##########
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ void stm32_boardinitialize(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_BOARD_LATE_INITIALIZE
void board_late_initialize(void)
{
-#if defined(CONFIG_NSH_LIBRARY) && !defined(CONFIG_BOARDCTL)
+#if defined(CONFIG_NSH_LIBRARY) && !defined(CONFIG_LIB_BOARDCTL)
Review Comment:
Hi @pkarashchenko, what do you propose in this case?
I see that there exists other boards does not check neither
`CONFIG_NSH_LIBRARY` nor `CONFIG_BOARDCTL` for intializing the board and other
that checks both.
* nuttx/boards/arm/samv7/samv71-xult/src/sam_boot.c
* nuttx/boards/arm/stm32/nucleo-f303ze/src/stm32_boot.c
In my case I have defined `CONFIG_NSH_LIBRARY` and also `CONFIG_BOARDCTL` so
the `stm32_bringup()` function is never reachable.
Why `CONFIG_BOARDCTL` must not be defined in order to perform a
board_late_initialization?
I am confused about the difference between `CONFIG_BOARDCTL` and
`CONFIG_LIB_BOARDCTL`
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
