[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13451770#comment-13451770
]
Michael Joyce commented on OODT-494:
------------------------------------
Given how small the code for it is, I would say leave it in case it becomes
useful later. Worst case, we can just remove it if it ends up being bloat. Not
sure what everyone else is thinking though, or if it's even remotely possible
that this code will be useful to us at some point later.
> Decide whether or not we need ParallelProcessor
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OODT-494
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-494
> Project: OODT
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: workflow manager
> Reporter: Chris A. Mattmann
> Assignee: Chris A. Mattmann
> Fix For: 0.5
>
>
> In the PackagedWorkflowRepository, I managed to get away without having to do
> any parallel workflow graphs, and simply used sequential models, along with
> the event-based system of the workflow manager. Thus, I'm not sure we
> explicitly need a parallel processor. Decide on whether or not to keep it.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
