[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13456650#comment-13456650
]
Chris A. Mattmann commented on OODT-494:
----------------------------------------
Hey Guys, I think we need ParallelProcessor too. In fact, I'm going to use this
issue to track the following suggested updates:
# define a new property,
*org.apache.oodt.cas.workflow.wengine.packagedRepo.parallelProcessors*. If set
to true, then the PackagedWorkflowRepository will neglect to compile additional
event/workflow instance logic to deal with parallelism, and will
leave it to the underlying engine to leverage its Graph to determine how to run
Parallel Processors
# test this property with both the ThreadPoolWorkflowEngine and the
PrioritizedQueueBasedWorkflowEngine
> Decide whether or not we need ParallelProcessor
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OODT-494
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-494
> Project: OODT
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: workflow manager
> Reporter: Chris A. Mattmann
> Assignee: Chris A. Mattmann
> Fix For: 0.5
>
>
> In the PackagedWorkflowRepository, I managed to get away without having to do
> any parallel workflow graphs, and simply used sequential models, along with
> the event-based system of the workflow manager. Thus, I'm not sure we
> explicitly need a parallel processor. Decide on whether or not to keep it.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
