jackjlli commented on pull request #6066:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/pull/6066#issuecomment-700322222


   > > The concern is that it may fail some existing use cases, which could 
cause production impact. And the silent 0 response has been supported for quite 
a while.
   > > I also thought about making it as a broker level config, while the 
broker could be shared by multiple tables, which expected behaviors might be 
different.
   > > That's why I make it as a flag in the query options.
   > 
   > I don't get this. if its already returning 0 results what are we trying to 
achieve by adding this behavior? Are users going to change their query to 
validate it. If they are already changing the code, isn't it better for them to 
change the way they handle the error.
   > 
   > overall, we should try to get this feature without adding a config flag.
   
   For the existing use cases who are still querying with PQL, the behavior 
doesn't change (i.e. returning 0). This is for the sake of backward compatible 
concern. Otherwise, these customers should immediately see exceptions whenever 
the new code gets deployed.
   
   For the new use cases who are going to use SQL, the default behavior is to 
fail the query if column name mismatches.
   
   For the new use cases who are going to use PQL, if they think it's essential 
to fail the query, they have the option to do that.
   
   > this is not a good implementation. can we do better than changing 
signatures of existing methods to pass this feature flag?
   
   One more option I can think of is to log a warning message in the broker log 
and emit a metric to track the behavior of PQL. And we add one broker level 
config for this option. If there is no column mismatch, we can turn it on to 
all the tables.


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to