siddharthteotia commented on PR #9930: URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/9930#issuecomment-1340387867
I am guessing we can use this to compare performance and even correctness between `broadcast join` , `shuffle join`, `colocated partitioning` table join ? I guess pretty much any scenario where we force the plan to not have an exchange ? Another question - are we using `shuffle` and `exchange` terminology interchangeably ? IIRC, this was the case on the original design docs. So when we say `shuffle` is disabled, does that mean shuffle based exchange is disabled (but broadcast exchange can happen) or `exchange` all together is disabled ? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
