michaeljmarshall commented on PR #19559:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/19559#issuecomment-1439549185

   > > Please discuss this change on the mailing list. This is a fundamental 
change.
   > 
   > I don't think it is a fundamental change. This is an obvious bug , memory 
is not used in the `getMaxResourceUsage` method in the same class. Two methods 
to get MaxResourceUsage, but the behavior is different
   > 
   > 
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/660525e57ed35b74cb9204521d1fba02cc08c542/pulsar-common/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/policies/data/loadbalancer/LocalBrokerData.java#L239-L243
   > 
   > 
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/660525e57ed35b74cb9204521d1fba02cc08c542/pulsar-common/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/policies/data/loadbalancer/LocalBrokerData.java#L253-L259
   
   Thanks for the references. This justification would have been very helpful 
to provide in the PR description.
   
   I missed https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/17598, which made the 
inconsistent change that you reference. Before 
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/17598, we used memory for both methods. 
That change could certainly have had a note on the mailing list since it is a 
fundamental change to how the load balancer works.
   
   This change will affect the `LeastResourceUsageWithWeight` and the 
`ThresholdShedder`.
   
   Interestingly, https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/17598 addresses the 
content of this PR and also addresses @Jason918's comment:
   
   > Note that this PR does not update `getMaxResourceUsageWithWeight*()`, as 
it already controls the memory usage by `loadBalancerMemoryResourceWeight=0.0`
   
   However, from what I see, `loadBalancerMemoryResourceWeight` defaults to 1, 
not 0.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to