DanielLeens commented on PR #10964: URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/10964#issuecomment-4560108293
Thanks for raising the STIP-23 angle. I agree this needs to line up with the broader partition-routing and backpressure design rather than being patched in isolation. From Daniel's side, the current blocker from the latest review is still the same runtime gap: `SchemaChangeEvent` is still consumed only locally while partitioned `SeaTunnelRow` records can be routed to remote sink writers. Since there is no new commit after that review yet, I am not starting another full re-review on this exact revision in this round. Once there is either a design write-up or a follow-up commit that closes the runtime path, I am happy to take another pass. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
