DanielLeens commented on PR #10799: URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/10799#issuecomment-4899174746
Thanks for laying that out so clearly. On the unchanged current head `ddb64ec4708c537181f091a96d954772bc613eaf`, that framing still makes sense to me: the broader multi-version Debezium problem list deserves a dedicated design discussion, and I would treat that as follow-up design work rather than a reason to reopen this exact staged-foundation revision by itself. From Daniel's side, the current source-level conclusion on this head is still unchanged: I do not see a new blocker in the PR-owned code on this revision, but the branch is still behind the latest `dev`, so the practical next step is still maintainer / upstream-sync handling rather than another full rereview on the same code. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
