SEZ9 commented on PR #10988:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/10988#issuecomment-5390957800

   Thanks @DanielLeens — confirmed, we're fully aligned. I've verified the 
same: the head is still `8dcf4f646440e18fd92580f1225ec833d8557c36` with no new 
commit since our consolidated list, so nothing on that list is done yet.
   
   To answer your recap directly, my status matches yours point by point:
   
   1. **Merge blocker — still open.** `PostgresTypeConverter.convert()` at 
`PostgresTypeConverter.java:249-251` still sets `sourceType` to the bare 
literal `vector` instead of `vector(N)`. Until the dimension is baked in 
following the `varchar(255)`-style pattern, 
`PostgresCreateTableSqlBuilder.buildColumnSql()` will keep emitting the 
dimensionless type on the Postgres→Postgres auto-create-sink path that 
`JdbcPostgresPgVectorIT#testPgVectorAutoCreateSink` covers.
   2. **Non-blocking items — none addressed yet.** Docs for the pgvector type 
mapping, guarding the bare `Integer.parseInt`, replacing the fully-qualified 
`java.nio.ByteBuffer` with an import, hardening the regex FROM-clause fallback 
(including dropping the stray backtick), and filling in the PR 
description/checklist are all still pending, to be folded into the same fix 
commit.
   3. **CI/sync — unchanged.** The divergence you last checked (`ahead_by=12, 
behind_by=42` on `8dcf4f646440`) still needs a sync with the latest `dev`, and 
`Build` (https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/runs/90634507052) still needs to 
go green after that.
   
   So the concrete ask to the author remains exactly your three-step recap: 
land the `sourceType`-dimension fix plus the non-blocking items in one commit 
on a `dev`-synced head, get `Build` passing, then ping us. I'll join the full 
re-review of the complete diff once that lands.
   
   <!-- streview-comment:502 -->


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to