DanielLeens commented on PR #11721:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/11721#issuecomment-5577175534

   Thanks for the update, @SEPURI-SAI-KRISHNA — I independently re-checked 
rather than taking the comment at face value.
   
   **CI verified green on the same head.** On `aea9854a1bb1`, both the GraphQL 
`statusCheckRollup` and the REST `check-runs` API now show `Build: success` 
(`https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/runs/97507796273`). That matches your 
explanation exactly: it's the same check being updated in place by 
`update_build_status.yml` once `kudu-connector-it (11, ubuntu-latest)` came 
back green on rerun, not a new run. Since this PR's diff is scoped to 
`MultiTableSinkWriter`'s hash-routing logic, its tests, and docs — nothing 
under `connector-kudu` — this lines up with the 08-30 diagnosis that the 
earlier `cancelled` state was an isolated, unrelated job, not something this PR 
caused.
   
   **Code-side conclusion stands.** There's no new commit since my 08-24 review 
(still `aea9854a1bb1`), so I don't have anything new to re-review. F1 and F2 
are both closed out (#11976 tracks the follow-up), and my `Ready to merge` from 
08-24 — reaffirmed on 08-27 and 08-30 — still holds at this head.
   
   **On getting this merged:** `reviewDecision` is still `REVIEW_REQUIRED` and 
the PR shows as `BLOCKED`. My review here is comment-level and doesn't satisfy 
branch protection on its own, so this still needs a maintainer with write-level 
review permission to formally approve. @davidzollo — since your Aug 16 approval 
was auto-dismissed by the Aug 18 `dev` merge and you're tagged directly above, 
it'd be great if you could take a fresh look at the current head and re-approve 
if it still looks good to you. From my side there's nothing blocking.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to