DanielLeens commented on PR #12958: URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/12958#issuecomment-6514208808
Thanks again. The CI fact cited previously has changed: the new merge head now has a successful aggregate Build. This supersedes the missing-current-head-check snapshot in my review; no activation patch, empty commit or redundant run is needed. CI was previously the only remaining technical blocker; CI is now passing, so my technical conclusion is clear to proceed to a write-capable maintainer for final approval. This READ-permission comment cannot grant effective APPROVED status. Snapshot 2026-10-30T03:23:54.102101+00:00: head `d7d9c790402920b2d85452114960811132883301`; [Signal pull request update](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/actions/runs/40901358694/job/123852212970) = `SUCCESS`; [Build](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/runs/123860964837) = `SUCCESS`. Base `dev`; comparison `diverged`, ahead 4, behind 3; merge state `blocked`. Behind/diverged alone is recorded metadata and does not add a sync request. This is an unchanged-head discussion/CI clarification, not a new complete source review, an effective approval or a dismissal of historical requested changes. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
