ANSHUMAN87 commented on a change in pull request #6238:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/6238#discussion_r475818271
##########
File path: tests/python/unittest/test_tir_transform_hoist_if.py
##########
@@ -255,6 +259,488 @@ def test_multi_if():
('tir.For', 'i'): (('tir.IfThenElse', ('i',)),)}
verify_structure(new_stmt, expected_struct)
+def test_no_hoisting_1():
+ ib = tvm.tir.ir_builder.create()
+ data = ib.pointer("float32", name="data")
+ n = te.var("n")
+
+ with ib.for_range(0, 10, "i") as i:
+ with ib.for_range(0, 10, "j") as j:
+ with ib.for_range(0, 10, "k") as k:
+ with ib.if_scope(k >= 3):
+ data[i * 100 + j * 10 + k] = data[i * 100 + j * 10 + k] +
0.5
+
+ stmt = ib.get()
+ mod = tvm.IRModule.from_expr(tvm.tir.PrimFunc([], stmt))
+ new_stmt = tvm.tir.transform.HoistIfThenElse()(mod)["main"].body
+ tvm.ir.assert_structural_equal(new_stmt, stmt)
+
+ with tvm.transform.PassContext(config={
+ "tir.HoistIfThenElse": {"support_block_scope_hosting": True}
+ }):
+ new_stmt = tvm.tir.transform.HoistIfThenElse()(mod)["main"].body
+ tvm.ir.assert_structural_equal(new_stmt, stmt)
+
+def test_no_hoisting_2():
+ ib = tvm.tir.ir_builder.create()
+ data = ib.pointer("float32", name="data")
+ n = te.var("n")
+ x = te.var("x")
+
+ with ib.for_range(0, 10, "i") as i:
+ with ib.for_range(0, 10, "j") as j:
+ with ib.for_range(0, 10, "k") as k:
+ with ib.if_scope(i >= 3):
+ data[i * 100 + j * 10 + k] = data[i * 100 + j * 10 + k] +
0.3
+ data[i * 100 + j * 10 + k] = data[i * 100 + j * 10 + k] + 0.5
+
+ stmt = ib.get()
+ mod = tvm.IRModule.from_expr(tvm.tir.PrimFunc([], stmt))
+ new_stmt = tvm.tir.transform.HoistIfThenElse()(mod)["main"].body
+ tvm.ir.assert_structural_equal(new_stmt, stmt)
+
+ with tvm.transform.PassContext(config={
+ "tir.HoistIfThenElse": {"support_block_scope_hosting": True}
+ }):
+ new_stmt = tvm.tir.transform.HoistIfThenElse()(mod)["main"].body
+ tvm.ir.assert_structural_equal(new_stmt, stmt)
+
+def test_no_hoisting_3():
+ ib = tvm.tir.ir_builder.create()
+ dshape = (32, 64)
+ dshape_inner = (33, 63)
+ data = ib.pointer("float32", name="data")
+ l = te.var('l')
+ m = te.var('m')
+ n = te.var('n')
+
+ tx = te.thread_axis("threadIdx.x")
+ bx = te.thread_axis("blockIdx.x")
+ ib.scope_attr(tx, "thread_extent", dshape[0])
+ ib.scope_attr(bx, "thread_extent", dshape[1])
+ with ib.for_range(0, l, "i") as i:
+ with ib.for_range(0, m, "j") as j:
+ with ib.for_range(0, n, "k") as k:
+ ib.scope_attr(tx, "thread_extent", dshape_inner[0])
+ ib.scope_attr(bx, "thread_extent", dshape_inner[1])
Review comment:
I am sorry! I am not sure whether i understand your point here clearly.
So please correct me if my reply is not as per.
In this case I am trying to show that there wont be any hoisting, in case
the scope of a variable is redefined.
And i think it may not be appropriate to hoist an Attr node, as it meant for
a particular block.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
