kparzysz-quic commented on PR #80:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/80#issuecomment-1176356191

   >     * The original goal was (and still is) to bring asynchronies in the 
TIR software pipeline. Two intrinsics were introduced specifically with this 
goal in mind: Rather than tackling a potentially more difficult problem of 
designing "general async semantics" for TIR, the machanics of the intrinsics 
are strongly tied to the software pipeline (in particular, the notion of 
"stage").
   
   The RFC states that the proposed mechanism is deliberately more general than 
what pipelining itself would require.  Was that added after the feedback?  I 
think that adding parallelization mechanisms that are specific to a particular 
scheduling operation is not the right thing to do, but it seems like the async 
queues could be used outside of pipelining.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to