areusch commented on code in PR #12534:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/12534#discussion_r953071105
##########
python/tvm/micro/testing/aot_test_utils.py:
##########
@@ -65,6 +65,17 @@
},
)
+AOT_SPIKE_RUNNER = AOTTestRunner(
Review Comment:
ah gotcha; it's probably fine to take that approach. I think we do want to
migrate the unit tests to Project API at some point (the advantage is that it
forces the set of information passed from compiler to runtime to be presented
in Model Library Format, thereby ensuring that we don't need side-channeled
information beyond that format). it might be easier to leave the tests as-is
for now, but i'm wondering if you foresee any challenge with using Project API
with SPIKE? cc @mehrdadh @mkatanbaf @gromero
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
