vinishjail97 commented on PR #895:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-xtable/pull/895#issuecomment-6091804443

   Thanks for taking this on @the-other-tim-brown, and thanks for the "License 
Check has never run" section in the description. That the check had been 
exiting 0 on `rg: command not found` since #822 is the real finding here, and 
it explains why #857 and #885 looked at odds with each other.
   
   The overall shape looks right to me: one canonical `LICENSE`/`NOTICE` per 
jar, the hive-metastore whitelist regenerated for Hive 3.1.3, and two checks 
that fail on the gaps instead of passing silently.
   
   One thing I would like your view on before this lands, left as an inline 
comment: the Maven CI build fails at spotless on the new Python script because 
`black` is not on the runner, and the two sibling scripts are already excluded 
in the root `pom.xml`.
   
   Two CI housekeeping items as well, both non-blocking from my side but they 
keep the checks red: the three commits carry the Claude co-author trailer that 
`validate-commit-coauthor` rejects, and `validate-pr-title` only accepts a 
single `[<issue>]` prefix, so `[865][701]` falls through to the 
conventional-commit check.
   
   On scope, I agree the thin-jar `META-INF/licenses/` part of #701 is best 
left out, and the `junit`/`hamcrest-core` exclusion reads to me like a separate 
PR. It would be good to land this in 0.5.0 so the release vote can rely on a 
green License Check again.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to