To move forward with this we need protoc 2.5.0 in the apache hadoop jenkins boxes.
Who can help with this? I assume somebody at Y!, right? Thx On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Elliott Clark <ecl...@apache.org> wrote: > In HBase land we've pretty well discovered that we'll need to have the > same version of protobuf that the HDFS/Yarn/MR servers are running. > That is to say there are issues with ever having 2.4.x and 2.5.x on > the same class path. > > Upgrading to 2.5.x would be great, as it brings some new classes we > could use. With that said HBase is getting pretty close to a rather > large release (0.96.0 aka The Singularity) so getting this in sooner > rather than later would be great. If we could get this into 2.1.0 it > would be great as that would allow us to have a pretty easy story to > users with regards to protobuf version. > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Kihwal Lee <kih...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > > Sorry to hijack the thread but, I also wanted to mention Avro. See > HADOOP-9672. > > The version we are using has memory leak and inefficiency issues. We've > seen users running into it. > > > > Kihwal > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Tsuyoshi OZAWA <ozawa.tsuyo...@gmail.com> > > To: "common-dev@hadoop.apache.org" <common-dev@hadoop.apache.org> > > Cc: "hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org" <hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org>; " > yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org" <yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org>; " > mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org" <mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org> > > Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2013 1:59 AM > > Subject: Re: Upgrade to protobuf 2.5.0 for the 2.1.0 release, HADOOP-9845 > > > > > > Hi, > > > > About Hadoop, Harsh is dealing with this problem in HADOOP-9346. > > For more detail, please see the JIRA ticket: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9346 > > > > - Tsuyoshi > > > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 1:49 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur <t...@cloudera.com> > wrote: > >> I' like to upgrade to protobuf 2.5.0 for the 2.1.0 release. > >> > >> As mentioned in HADOOP-9845, Protobuf 2.5 has significant benefits to > >> justify the upgrade. > >> > >> Doing the upgrade now, with the first beta, will make things easier for > >> downstream projects (like HBase) using protobuf and adopting Hadoop 2. > If > >> we do the upgrade later, downstream projects will have to support 2 > >> different versions and they my get in nasty waters due to classpath > issues. > >> > >> I've locally tested the patch in a pseudo deployment of 2.1.0-beta > branch > >> and it works fine (something is broken in trunk in the RPC layer > YARN-885). > >> > >> Now, to do this it will require a few things: > >> > >> * Make sure protobuf 2.5.0 is available in the jenkins box > >> * A follow up email to dev@ aliases indicating developers should > install > >> locally protobuf 2.5.0 > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> -- > >> Alejandro > -- Alejandro
