Alejandro, I'm upgrading protobuf on slaves hadoop1-hadoop9.
-Giri On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <t...@cloudera.com>wrote: > pinging again, I need help from somebody with sudo access to the hadoop > jenkins boxes to do this or to get sudo access for a couple of hours to set > up myself. > > Please!!! > > thx > > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <t...@cloudera.com > >wrote: > > > To move forward with this we need protoc 2.5.0 in the apache hadoop > > jenkins boxes. > > > > Who can help with this? I assume somebody at Y!, right? > > > > Thx > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Elliott Clark <ecl...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> In HBase land we've pretty well discovered that we'll need to have the > >> same version of protobuf that the HDFS/Yarn/MR servers are running. > >> That is to say there are issues with ever having 2.4.x and 2.5.x on > >> the same class path. > >> > >> Upgrading to 2.5.x would be great, as it brings some new classes we > >> could use. With that said HBase is getting pretty close to a rather > >> large release (0.96.0 aka The Singularity) so getting this in sooner > >> rather than later would be great. If we could get this into 2.1.0 it > >> would be great as that would allow us to have a pretty easy story to > >> users with regards to protobuf version. > >> > >> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Kihwal Lee <kih...@yahoo-inc.com> > wrote: > >> > Sorry to hijack the thread but, I also wanted to mention Avro. See > >> HADOOP-9672. > >> > The version we are using has memory leak and inefficiency issues. > We've > >> seen users running into it. > >> > > >> > Kihwal > >> > > >> > > >> > ________________________________ > >> > From: Tsuyoshi OZAWA <ozawa.tsuyo...@gmail.com> > >> > To: "common-dev@hadoop.apache.org" <common-dev@hadoop.apache.org> > >> > Cc: "hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org" <hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org>; " > >> yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org" <yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org>; " > >> mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org" <mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org> > >> > Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2013 1:59 AM > >> > Subject: Re: Upgrade to protobuf 2.5.0 for the 2.1.0 release, > >> HADOOP-9845 > >> > > >> > > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > About Hadoop, Harsh is dealing with this problem in HADOOP-9346. > >> > For more detail, please see the JIRA ticket: > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9346 > >> > > >> > - Tsuyoshi > >> > > >> > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 1:49 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur <t...@cloudera.com > > > >> wrote: > >> >> I' like to upgrade to protobuf 2.5.0 for the 2.1.0 release. > >> >> > >> >> As mentioned in HADOOP-9845, Protobuf 2.5 has significant benefits to > >> >> justify the upgrade. > >> >> > >> >> Doing the upgrade now, with the first beta, will make things easier > for > >> >> downstream projects (like HBase) using protobuf and adopting Hadoop > 2. > >> If > >> >> we do the upgrade later, downstream projects will have to support 2 > >> >> different versions and they my get in nasty waters due to classpath > >> issues. > >> >> > >> >> I've locally tested the patch in a pseudo deployment of 2.1.0-beta > >> branch > >> >> and it works fine (something is broken in trunk in the RPC layer > >> YARN-885). > >> >> > >> >> Now, to do this it will require a few things: > >> >> > >> >> * Make sure protobuf 2.5.0 is available in the jenkins box > >> >> * A follow up email to dev@ aliases indicating developers should > >> install > >> >> locally protobuf 2.5.0 > >> >> > >> >> Thanks. > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Alejandro > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Alejandro > > > > > > -- > Alejandro >
