Looks Following Jira's are not updated in CHANGES.txt

HADOOP-14066,HDFS-11608,HADOOP-14293,HDFS-11628,YARN-6274,YARN-6152,HADOOP-13119,HDFS-10733,HADOOP-13958,HDFS-11280,YARN-6024.

May be we can raise one Jira to track this..?


--Brahma Reddy Battula

-----Original Message-----
From: Akira Ajisaka [mailto:aajis...@apache.org] 
Sent: 25 April 2017 15:36
To: Haohui Mai
Cc: Brahma Reddy Battula; Andrew Wang; Sangjin Lee; Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli; 
Marton Elek; Hadoop Common; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; Hdfs-dev; 
mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: About 2.7.4 Release

 > It would be great to backport HDFS-9710 to 2.7.4 as this is one of the  > 
 > critical fixes on scalability.

Sounds good.

 > Maybe we should create a jira to track this?

I think now either way (reopen or create) is fine.

Release doc maker creates change logs by fetching information from JIRA, so 
reopening the tickets should be avoided when a release process is in progress.

The issue HDFS-9710 (and HDFS-9726) have been fixed in 2.8.0 and
3.0.0-alpha1 and both versions have been released, so reopening this issue does 
not affect the release doc maker.

-Akira

On 2017/04/25 16:21, Haohui Mai wrote:
> It would be great to backport HDFS-9710 to 2.7.4 as this is one of the 
> critical fixes on scalability. Maybe we should create a jira to track 
> this?
>
> ~Haohui
>
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Akira Ajisaka <aajis...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Ping
>>
>> I too can help with the release process.
>>
>> Now there are 0 blocker and 6 critical issues targeted for 2.7.4.
>> https://s.apache.org/HsIu
>>
>> If there are critical/blocker issues that need to be fixed in 
>> branch-2.7, please set Target Version/s to 2.7.4. That way the issues 
>> can be found by the above query.
>>
>> I'll check if there are conflicts among JIRA, git commit log, and the 
>> change logs.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Akira
>>
>>
>> On 2017/04/18 15:40, Brahma Reddy Battula wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All
>>>
>>> Any update on 2.7.4 ..?  Gentle Remainder!! Let me know anything I 
>>> can help on this..
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Brahma Reddy Battula
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Andrew Wang [mailto:andrew.w...@cloudera.com]
>>> Sent: 08 March 2017 04:22
>>> To: Sangjin Lee
>>> Cc: Marton Elek; Hadoop Common; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; 
>>> Hdfs-dev; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: About 2.7.4 Release
>>>
>>> Our release steps are documented on the wiki:
>>>
>>> 2.6/2.7:
>>>
>>> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToReleasePreDSBCR
>>>
>>> 2.8+:
>>> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRelease
>>>
>>> I think given the push toward 2.8 and 3.0, there's less interest in 
>>> streamlining the 2.6 and 2.7 release processes. CHANGES.txt is the 
>>> biggest pain, and that's fixed in 2.8+.
>>>
>>> Current pain points for 2.8+ include:
>>>
>>> # fixing up JIRA versions and the release notes, though I somewhat 
>>> addressed this with the versions script for 3.x # making and staging 
>>> an RC and sending the vote email still requires a lot of manual 
>>> steps # publishing the release is also quite manual
>>>
>>> I think the RC issues can be attacked with enough scripting. Steve 
>>> had an ant file that automated a lot of this for slider. I think 
>>> it'd be nice to have a nightly Jenkins job that builds an RC, since 
>>> I've spent a day or two for each 3.x alpha fixing build issues.
>>>
>>> Publishing can be attacked via a mix of scripting and revamping the 
>>> darned website. Forrest is pretty bad compared to the newer static 
>>> site generators out there (e.g. need to write XML instead of 
>>> markdown, it's hard to review a staging site because of all the 
>>> absolute links, hard to customize, did I mention XML?), and the look 
>>> and feel of the site is from the 00s. We don't actually have that 
>>> much site content, so it should be possible to migrate to a new system.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Sangjin Lee <sj...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I don't think there should be any linkage between releasing 2.8.0 
>>>> and 2.7.4. If we have a volunteer for releasing 2.7.4, we should go 
>>>> full speed ahead. We still need a volunteer from a PMC member or a 
>>>> committer as some tasks may require certain privileges, but I don't 
>>>> think it precludes working with others to close down the release.
>>>>
>>>> I for one would like to see more frequent releases, and being able 
>>>> to automate release steps more would go a long way.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Marton Elek <me...@hortonworks.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Is there any reason to wait for 2.8 with 2.7.4?
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately the previous  thread about release cadence has been 
>>>>> ended without final decision. But if I understood well, there was 
>>>>> more or less
>>>>
>>>> an
>>>>>
>>>>> agreement about that it would be great to achieve more frequent 
>>>>> releases, if possible (with or without written rules and EOL policy).
>>>>>
>>>>> I personally prefer to be more closer to the scheduling part of 
>>>>> the
>>>>> proposal:
>>>>>
>>>>> "A minor release on the latest major line should be every 6 
>>>>> months, and a maintenance release on a minor release (as there may 
>>>>> be concurrently maintained minor releases) every 2 months".
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know what is the hardest part of creating new 
>>>>> minor/maintenance releases. But if the problems are technical 
>>>>> (smoketesting, unit tests,
>>>>
>>>> old
>>>>>
>>>>> release script, anything else) I would be happy to do any task for 
>>>>> new maintenance releases (or more frequent releases).
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Marton
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ________________________________________
>>>>> From: Akira Ajisaka <aajis...@apache.org>
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2017 7:34 AM
>>>>> To: Brahma Reddy Battula; Hadoop Common; 
>>>>> yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; Hdfs-dev; 
>>>>> mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: About 2.7.4 Release
>>>>>
>>>>> Probably 2.8.0 will be released soon.
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13866?
>>>>> focusedCommentId=15898379&page=com.atlassian.jira.
>>>>> plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15898379
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm thinking 2.7.4 release process starts after 2.8.0 release, so
>>>>> 2.7.4 will be released in April or May. (hopefully)
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Akira
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2017/03/01 21:01, Brahma Reddy Battula wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi All
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It has been six months for branch-2.7 release.. is there any near 
>>>>>> plan
>>>>>
>>>>> for 2.7.4..?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks&Regards
>>>>>> Brahma Reddy Battula
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> --
>>>>> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> --
>>>>> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to