[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16001566#comment-16001566
]
stack commented on HADOOP-14284:
--------------------------------
bq. ...get rid of it....
This doesn't seem right either mighty [~djp]. Guava is a high quality lib. It
is well tested with a particular attention paid to perf. I'd think we'd want to
double-down on libs of this type rather than move to purge it. Would
netty/protobuf/etc. be next in line sir?
[~ozawa] Have you brought up the project in an IDE with your patch applied? My
expectation is that there will reams of complaint that the relocated guava
can't be found....
> Shade Guava everywhere
> ----------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-14284
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14284
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: build
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha3
> Reporter: Andrew Wang
> Assignee: Tsuyoshi Ozawa
> Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: HADOOP-14238.pre001.patch, HADOOP-14284.002.patch,
> HADOOP-14284.004.patch, HADOOP-14284.007.patch, HADOOP-14284.010.patch,
> HADOOP-14284.012.patch
>
>
> HADOOP-10101 upgraded the guava version for 3.x to 21.
> Guava is broadly used by Java projects that consume our artifacts.
> Unfortunately, these projects also consume our private artifacts like
> {{hadoop-hdfs}}. They also are unlikely on the new shaded client introduced
> by HADOOP-11804, currently only available in 3.0.0-alpha2.
> We should shade Guava everywhere to proactively avoid breaking downstreams.
> This isn't a requirement for all dependency upgrades, but it's necessary for
> known-bad dependencies like Guava.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
