[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16122184#comment-16122184 ]
Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-14749: ----------------------------------------- thx, I'll go through Mingliang's comments and do a final revision. * yes. should use DynamoDB everywhere. * we do generate javadocs, though I'm not sure the publishing is code. So I'm trying to be consistent. * provision burden? You mean allow us to overspecify for peak loads. Makes sense BTW, one situation I'm thinking about now: how to handle s3guard as a read-only client. That is, you can get the auth/hon-auth data from others, but you can't write back yourself (indeed, can't write back to the FS) > review s3guard docs & code prior to merge > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-14749 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14749 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: documentation, fs/s3 > Affects Versions: HADOOP-13345 > Reporter: Steve Loughran > Assignee: Steve Loughran > Attachments: HADOOP-14749-HADOOP-13345-001.patch, > HADOOP-14749-HADOOP-13345-002.patch, HADOOP-14749-HADOOP-13345-003.patch > > Original Estimate: 24h > Remaining Estimate: 24h > > Pre-merge cleanup while it's still easy to do > * Read through all the docs, tune > * Diff the trunk/branch files to see if we can reduce the delta (and hence > the changes) > * Review the new tests -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org