[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17203813#comment-17203813
]
Jinglun commented on HADOOP-17280:
----------------------------------
Hi [~tasanuma] [~hexiaoqiao], thanks your great comments !
{quote}Please adjust the order of assertEquals at L452-L455 to other places.
{quote}
[~tasanuma] I didn't fully understand of this, beg your pardon. Could you be
more specific, thanks very much !
Other comments are targeted, upload v05 pending jenkins.
> Service-user cost shouldn't be accumulated to totalDecayedCallCost and
> totalRawCallCost.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-17280
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17280
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Jinglun
> Assignee: Jinglun
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-17280.001.patch, HADOOP-17280.002.patch,
> HADOOP-17280.003.patch, HADOOP-17280.004.patch, HADOOP-17280.005.patch
>
>
> HADOOP-17165 has introduced a very useful feature: service-user. After this
> feature I think we shouldn't add the service-user's cost into
> totalDecayedCallCost and totalRawCallCost anymore. Because it may give all
> the identities the priority 0(Supposing we have a big service-user).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
