[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13226568#comment-13226568
]
Jonathan Natkins commented on HADOOP-8121:
------------------------------------------
Yeah, I see what you mean. Would it be acceptable if I renamed this class back
to its original ActiveDirectoryGroupsMapping, and went with that for now? It
almost makes sense to have two separate classes for ActiveDirectory versus LDAP
proper, since the AD schema is very set in stone, where as LDAP is much more
flexible, depending on the group class you're using, and how an organization
has their schema setup.
> Active Directory Group Mapping Service
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-8121
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8121
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: security
> Reporter: Jonathan Natkins
> Assignee: Jonathan Natkins
> Attachments: HADOOP-8121.patch, HADOOP-8121.patch, HADOOP-8121.patch,
> HADOOP-8121.patch, HADOOP-8121.patch, HADOOP-8121.patch, HADOOP-8121.patch,
> HADOOP-8121.patch
>
>
> Planning on building a group mapping service that will go and talk directly
> to an Active Directory setup to get group memberships
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
