[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13228459#comment-13228459
]
Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-8121:
------------------------------------------
Docs:
Is the only documentation going to be the javadoc code? How are admins
supposed to find this?
---
{code}
+ * ShellBasedUnixGroupsMapping should be sufficient. However, in cases where
{code}
"is preferred" rather than "should be sufficient".
{code}
+ * access control, this class maybe used to communicate directly with the LDAP
{code}
may be
---
Functional:
a) I'm still concerned about what happens when this code hits a search limit.
I suspect that the places most likely to deploy this plug-in will have this
issue...
b) Am I correct that we don't support cascading groupOfNames? If not, that
should also be documented.
> Active Directory Group Mapping Service
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-8121
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8121
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: security
> Reporter: Jonathan Natkins
> Assignee: Jonathan Natkins
> Attachments: HADOOP-8121.patch, HADOOP-8121.patch, HADOOP-8121.patch,
> HADOOP-8121.patch, HADOOP-8121.patch, HADOOP-8121.patch, HADOOP-8121.patch,
> HADOOP-8121.patch, HADOOP-8121.patch
>
>
> Planning on building a group mapping service that will go and talk directly
> to an Active Directory setup to get group memberships
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
