[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13538570#comment-13538570
 ] 

Arun C Murthy commented on HADOOP-9151:
---------------------------------------

Todd - I don't see how you can veto a patch based on commercial interests of 
your employer. It's invalid, you can't hold the community hostage to your 
commercial interests.

This isn't a one-off either, this is exactly the reason we've had the 'alpha' 
moniker - iron out early issues in protocols/apis etc. in hadoop-2. 
Incidentally, this is exactly why YARN-142 & MAPREDUCE-4067 are being done 
*before* we even call hadoop-2 as 'beta'. 

We've also discussed this publicly - see http://s.apache.org/28V, 
http://s.apache.org/qQp & http://s.apache.org/xLs.
                
> Include RPC error info in RpcResponseHeader instead of sending it separately
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-9151
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9151
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Sanjay Radia
>            Assignee: Sanjay Radia
>         Attachments: HADOOP-9151.patch
>
>


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to