[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13538570#comment-13538570
]
Arun C Murthy commented on HADOOP-9151:
---------------------------------------
Todd - I don't see how you can veto a patch based on commercial interests of
your employer. It's invalid, you can't hold the community hostage to your
commercial interests.
This isn't a one-off either, this is exactly the reason we've had the 'alpha'
moniker - iron out early issues in protocols/apis etc. in hadoop-2.
Incidentally, this is exactly why YARN-142 & MAPREDUCE-4067 are being done
*before* we even call hadoop-2 as 'beta'.
We've also discussed this publicly - see http://s.apache.org/28V,
http://s.apache.org/qQp & http://s.apache.org/xLs.
> Include RPC error info in RpcResponseHeader instead of sending it separately
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-9151
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9151
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Sanjay Radia
> Assignee: Sanjay Radia
> Attachments: HADOOP-9151.patch
>
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira