[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13539206#comment-13539206
 ] 

Arun C Murthy commented on HADOOP-9151:
---------------------------------------

bq. For any given issue, I would like to weigh three aspects against each 
other: [...] If someone finds a big performance improvement or a security bug, 
and it's difficult to fix it in a compatible way, I'm not going to veto it. 

Good, we are mostly on same page.

However, we need to add a fourth: long-term maintenance cost. If we see a lot 
of issues such as this, we fix them during the alpha/beta stage *before* we 
call hadoop-2 as 'stable', rather than maintain all sorts of workarounds for 
the sake of CDH compatibility. I believe hadoop-2 will be around for a long 
while and I don't think we should carry that burden - look at how long hadoop-1 
has been around.
                
> Include RPC error info in RpcResponseHeader instead of sending it separately
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-9151
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9151
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Sanjay Radia
>            Assignee: Sanjay Radia
>         Attachments: HADOOP-9151.patch
>
>


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to