[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14037928#comment-14037928
]
Haohui Mai commented on HADOOP-10389:
-------------------------------------
bq. Boost's major, blocker-level drawback is it's compatibility with itself.
Just make sure we're on the same page, I think the boost library will be linked
statically and no symbols will be exported. The user of the library should not
be aware of the existence of boost. Therefore I don't quite understand where
the compatibility issue is coming from. I played around locally and it worked
for me. I can update the patch if needed.
Does it address your concern? If you don't like boost, I have no problems using
an in-house implementation like what [~decster] did, or {{libuv}}.
> Native RPCv9 client
> -------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-10389
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10389
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Affects Versions: HADOOP-10388
> Reporter: Binglin Chang
> Assignee: Colin Patrick McCabe
> Attachments: HADOOP-10388.001.patch,
> HADOOP-10389-alternative.000.patch, HADOOP-10389.002.patch,
> HADOOP-10389.004.patch, HADOOP-10389.005.patch
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
