[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14038157#comment-14038157
]
Allen Wittenauer commented on HADOOP-10389:
-------------------------------------------
Not really, no, because it becomes a code maintenance nightmare whenever the
API changes. "Oh, we have to compile with this specific version of boost." (
Ironically, I was just told a story about someone who had this exact problem
with Impala just today.) Historically, the Hadoop project has been trying to
jettison those types of dependencies. (Hai forrest.)
As to libuv, I'm still looking at Colin's patch. I have some concerns about
libuv's stability as well (esp given
http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/libuv.html) since lack experience with
it... unlike boost.
> Native RPCv9 client
> -------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-10389
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10389
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Affects Versions: HADOOP-10388
> Reporter: Binglin Chang
> Assignee: Colin Patrick McCabe
> Attachments: HADOOP-10388.001.patch,
> HADOOP-10389-alternative.000.patch, HADOOP-10389.002.patch,
> HADOOP-10389.004.patch, HADOOP-10389.005.patch
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
