[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14061513#comment-14061513
 ] 

Andrew Wang commented on HADOOP-10816:
--------------------------------------

I think we should still say "small positive integer", but also test that it 
returns 1 right now. I think this will let us add new return codes later, but 
also make sure that the code for a particular error doesn't change between 
releases. Does this make sense to you too? Thanks Mike. :)

> key shell returns -1 to the shell on error, should be 1
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-10816
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10816
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: security
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>            Reporter: Mike Yoder
>            Assignee: Mike Yoder
>             Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HADOOP-10816.001.patch
>
>
> I've seen this in several places now - commands returning -1 on failure to 
> the shell. It's a bug. Someone confused their posix style returns (0 on 
> success, < 0 on failure) with program returns, which are an unsigned 
> character. Thus, a return of -1 actually becomes 255 to the shell.
> {noformat}
> $ hadoop key create happykey2 --provider kms://http@localhost:16000/kms 
> --attr "a=a" --attr "a=b"
> Each attribute must correspond to only one value:
> atttribute "a" was repeated
> ...
> $ echo $?
> 255
> {noformat}
> A return value of 1 instead of -1 does the right thing.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to