[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14127608#comment-14127608
]
Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-9989:
--------------------------------------------
After poking Zhiahi offline for a bit on this I think I understand the whole
story here. My concern was that this would be an incompatible change, but it is
safe to change from json to binary the property because MR submitter code
handles both.
+1
> Bug introduced in HADOOP-9374, which parses the -tokenCacheFile as binary
> file but set it to the configuration as JSON file.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-9989
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9989
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: security, util
> Affects Versions: 2.1.0-beta
> Environment: Red Hat Enterprise 6 with Sun Java 1.7 and IBM Java 1.6
> Reporter: Jinghui Wang
> Assignee: zhihai xu
> Attachments: HADOOP-9989.001.patch, HADOOP-9989.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 0h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The code in JIRA HADOOP-9374's patch introduced a bug, where the value of the
> tokenCacheFile parameter is being parsed as a binary file and set it to the
> mapreduce.job.credentials.json parameter in GenericOptionsParser, which
> cannot be parsed by JobSubmitter when it gets the value.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)