The one in commons-util is the one I am referring to. Hashtable also differs from HashMap in that it is threadsafe (ie slower), if you need that.
Scott > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael A. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:50 AM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: RE: Silly Question > > > On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Scott Sanders wrote: > > But doesn't SequencedHashMap use the collections API? What if, for > > some extremely crazy reason, you can't (JDK 1.0)? Hashtable != > > HashMap, people. > > The collections component specifies that its objects conform > to the Java2 collections API: > > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/collections.html > > In any case, take a look at the SequencedHashtable > implementation in the utils sandbox. While it extends > "Hashtable" rather than "HashMap", that doesn't make it JDK > <=1.1 compatible. Just looking at the imports demonstrates > the SequencedHashtable is not <=1.1 compatible: > > import java.util.LinkedList; > import java.util.List; > import java.util.Map; > import java.util.Set; > > regards, > michael > > > > > > Scott > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Janek Bogucki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:08 AM > > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > > > Subject: Re: Silly Question > > > > > > > > > It's already in commons-collections 1.1-dev as > SequencedHashMap, and > > > very useful it is too :) > > > > > > -Janek > > > > > > > From: "Scott Sanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 21:00:56 -0800 > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Subject: Silly Question > > > > > > > > In the sanbox in utils, there exists a SequencedHashtable. > > > > > > > > Other than the obvious, why is this not in > > > commons-collections? Are we > > > > saying that something has to implement/extend the > > > Collections API to > > > > be included? > > > > > > > > The PROPOSAL.html states that collections was intended for > > > ADTs, not > > > > just Collections API stuff. > > > > > > > > So can we say that anything collectionesque (ie, hastables, > > > > vectors, > > > > etc) should also be included? > > > > > > > > I think that commons-collections is small enough to warrant the > > > > inclusion of this SequencedHashtable, and possibly others, > > > as I find > > > > them. > > > > > > > > I will start adding these to commons-collections. Can I > get some > > > > feedback, maybe even some +1s? > > > > > > > > Scott Sanders > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > <mailto:commons-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > For > > > additional commands, > > > e-mail: > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > <mailto:commons-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > For > > > additional commands, > > > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:commons-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For > additional commands, > e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:commons-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For > additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
