So these two implementations differs in the following ways
Component: util collections
Name: ...util.SequencedHashtable ...collections.SequencedHashMap
Parent Class: java.util.Hashtable java.util.HashMap
Sysnchronized: yes no
All other things in those two classes are equivalent (including the fact
that they require JDK 1.2). Do a diff. :)
I'm not sure what your point is though. What are you asking?
Are you asking whether SequencedHashtable should be committed to the
collections component unaltered? Asking whether no-JDK 1.2 collection
types can go into the collections component? Or are you asking something
else?
regards,
michael
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Scott Sanders wrote:
> The one in commons-util is the one I am referring to. Hashtable also
> differs from HashMap in that it is threadsafe (ie slower), if you need
> that.
>
> Scott
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael A. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:50 AM
> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > Subject: RE: Silly Question
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Scott Sanders wrote:
> > > But doesn't SequencedHashMap use the collections API? What if, for
> > > some extremely crazy reason, you can't (JDK 1.0)? Hashtable !=
> > > HashMap, people.
> >
> > The collections component specifies that its objects conform
> > to the Java2 collections API:
> >
> > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/collections.html
> >
> > In any case, take a look at the SequencedHashtable
> > implementation in the utils sandbox. While it extends
> > "Hashtable" rather than "HashMap", that doesn't make it JDK
> > <=1.1 compatible. Just looking at the imports demonstrates
> > the SequencedHashtable is not <=1.1 compatible:
> >
> > import java.util.LinkedList;
> > import java.util.List;
> > import java.util.Map;
> > import java.util.Set;
> >
> > regards,
> > michael
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Scott
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Janek Bogucki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:08 AM
> > > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > > > Subject: Re: Silly Question
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It's already in commons-collections 1.1-dev as
> > SequencedHashMap, and
> > > > very useful it is too :)
> > > >
> > > > -Janek
> > > >
> > > > > From: "Scott Sanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List"
> > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 21:00:56 -0800
> > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Subject: Silly Question
> > > > >
> > > > > In the sanbox in utils, there exists a SequencedHashtable.
> > > > >
> > > > > Other than the obvious, why is this not in
> > > > commons-collections? Are we
> > > > > saying that something has to implement/extend the
> > > > Collections API to
> > > > > be included?
> > > > >
> > > > > The PROPOSAL.html states that collections was intended for
> > > > ADTs, not
> > > > > just Collections API stuff.
> > > > >
> > > > > So can we say that anything collectionesque (ie, hastables,
> > > > > vectors,
> > > > > etc) should also be included?
> > > > >
> > > > > I think that commons-collections is small enough to warrant the
> > > > > inclusion of this SequencedHashtable, and possibly others,
> > > > as I find
> > > > > them.
> > > > >
> > > > > I will start adding these to commons-collections. Can I
> > get some
> > > > > feedback, maybe even some +1s?
> > > > >
> > > > > Scott Sanders
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > <mailto:commons-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > For
> > > > additional commands,
> > > > e-mail:
> > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > <mailto:commons-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > For
> > > > additional commands,
> > > > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:commons-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For
> > additional commands,
> > e-mail:
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:commons-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For
> > additional commands,
> > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
