Inline... > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael A. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:11 AM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: RE: Silly Question > > > So these two implementations differs in the following ways > > Component: util collections > Name: ...util.SequencedHashtable > ...collections.SequencedHashMap > Parent Class: java.util.Hashtable java.util.HashMap > Sysnchronized: yes no > > All other things in those two classes are equivalent > (including the fact that they require JDK 1.2). Do a diff. :)
Yes. > > > I'm not sure what your point is though. What are you asking? > > Are you asking whether SequencedHashtable should be committed > to the collections component unaltered? Yes. >Asking whether > no-JDK 1.2 collection types can go into the collections > component? Yes. >Or are you asking something else? Nope. > > regards, > michael > > On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Scott Sanders wrote: > > The one in commons-util is the one I am referring to. > Hashtable also > > differs from HashMap in that it is threadsafe (ie slower), > if you need > > that. > > > > Scott > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Michael A. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:50 AM > > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > > > Subject: RE: Silly Question > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Scott Sanders wrote: > > > > But doesn't SequencedHashMap use the collections API? What if, > > > > for some extremely crazy reason, you can't (JDK 1.0)? > Hashtable > > > > != HashMap, people. > > > > > > The collections component specifies that its objects > conform to the > > > Java2 collections API: > > > > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/collections.html > > > > > > In any case, take a look at the SequencedHashtable > implementation in > > > the utils sandbox. While it extends "Hashtable" rather than > > > "HashMap", that doesn't make it JDK <=1.1 compatible. > Just looking > > > at the imports demonstrates the SequencedHashtable is not <=1.1 > > > compatible: > > > > > > import java.util.LinkedList; > > > import java.util.List; > > > import java.util.Map; > > > import java.util.Set; > > > > > > regards, > > > michael > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Scott > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Janek Bogucki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:08 AM > > > > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > > > > > Subject: Re: Silly Question > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's already in commons-collections 1.1-dev as > > > SequencedHashMap, and > > > > > very useful it is too :) > > > > > > > > > > -Janek > > > > > > > > > > > From: "Scott Sanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 21:00:56 -0800 > > > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > Subject: Silly Question > > > > > > > > > > > > In the sanbox in utils, there exists a SequencedHashtable. > > > > > > > > > > > > Other than the obvious, why is this not in > > > > > commons-collections? Are we > > > > > > saying that something has to implement/extend the > > > > > Collections API to > > > > > > be included? > > > > > > > > > > > > The PROPOSAL.html states that collections was intended for > > > > > ADTs, not > > > > > > just Collections API stuff. > > > > > > > > > > > > So can we say that anything collectionesque (ie, hastables, > > > > > > vectors, > > > > > > etc) should also be included? > > > > > > > > > > > > I think that commons-collections is small enough to warrant > > > > > > the inclusion of this SequencedHashtable, and > possibly others, > > > > > as I find > > > > > > them. > > > > > > > > > > > > I will start adding these to commons-collections. Can I > > > get some > > > > > > feedback, maybe even some +1s? > > > > > > > > > > > > Scott Sanders > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > > <mailto:commons-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > For > > > > > additional commands, > > > > > e-mail: > > > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > > <mailto:commons-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> For > > > > > additional commands, > > > > > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > <mailto:commons-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > For > > > additional commands, > > > e-mail: > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > <mailto:commons-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > For > > > additional commands, > > > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:commons-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For > additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:commons-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For > additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
