On Tuesday, January 29, 2002, at 09:16 PM, Berin Loritsch wrote: > Remy Maucherat wrote: > >>> So that clinches it. The _initial_ HttpClient abstraction was >>> definitely >>> not informed by Avalon. In fact, we had already packaged Logging as a >>> separate component by then. (Hey, I guess I wrote the proposal. I >>> should >>> add myself as a contributor!) >>> >>> Maybe the Avalon abstraction should have a credit to HttpClient. ;) >>> >> +1 ;-) >> Although, seeing all this, I'm not sure I want to be involved in any way >> with Avalon ;-) > > > However, if you guys tried to work with us from the outset, much of this > confusion would never have risen.
unfortunately creating a solution based on avalon was vetoed. the only reasonable way to make progress was therefore to pursue an independent strategy. the commons is simply too big and too diverse to be able to work coherently as a whole with anyone. - robert -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
