On Wed, 30 Jan 2002 07:54, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > So that clinches it. The _initial_ HttpClient abstraction was definitely > > not informed by Avalon. In fact, we had already packaged Logging as a > > separate component by then. (Hey, I guess I wrote the proposal. I > > should add myself as a contributor!) > > > > Maybe the Avalon abstraction should have a credit to HttpClient. ;) > > +1 ;-) > Although, seeing all this, I'm not sure I want to be involved in any way > with Avalon ;-)
You have already said that before. In fact I recall you saying that you would never use Avalon at all and would work hard to make sure no one else used that. -- Cheers, Pete ------------------------------------------------------- "When we remember we are all mad, the mysteries of life disappear and life stands explained." -Mark Twain ------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
