Perhaps we should not name something so generic as util in commons
proper.  Perhaps we should have io, lang, text as Java does?  Anyone?

Utils could stay in the sandbox as the 'sorting' place?

Scott

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Rall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 7:13 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: Dependency question
> 
> 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > On that note, how about a Lang sub-project for 
> core-language helpers. 
> > Number/Date/String/Url/File helpers etc.
> 
> This is basically what I see Util as, a little bit of 
> java.lang, java.util, and perhaps java.text.
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> <mailto:commons-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For 
> additional commands, 
> e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to