It *is* a bigger step, but one I am willing to help do the work on. Perhaps we could all get them bootstrapped and proposed to the commons together?
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 8:58 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: RE: Dependency question > > > > Yes and no. I'm in favour with it as a general idea, though > it seems a bigger step than just moving Utils into main cvs > and cleaning shop. There would still need to be a util package though. > > Some of the components in Utils are real java.util style components. > > On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Scott Sanders wrote: > > > Perhaps we should not name something so generic as util in commons > > proper. Perhaps we should have io, lang, text as Java > does? Anyone? > > > > Utils could stay in the sandbox as the 'sorting' place? > > > > Scott > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Daniel Rall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 7:13 PM > > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > > > Subject: Re: Dependency question > > > > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > On that note, how about a Lang sub-project for > > > core-language helpers. > > > > Number/Date/String/Url/File helpers etc. > > > > > > This is basically what I see Util as, a little bit of java.lang, > > > java.util, and perhaps java.text. > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > <mailto:commons-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > For > > > additional commands, > > > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:commons-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For > additional commands, > e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:commons-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For > additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
