I was just playing around with Clazz (thinking about replacing my horrible
own hack)
and stumbled across the following. I have a class that contains a method
addFoo(Foo foo)
but not getFoos() or setFoos(List list)
so Foo is not considered a property because of the following code in
ReflectedListPropertyParseResults#checkConsistency:
if (readMethodParseResults == null && getMethodParseResults ==
null){
return false;
}
is this a deliberate decision? Can I not have write-only properties?
I know this sounds strange, but in this case my add-method is
"addField(MetaField field)" which adds a field to a MetaClass and the
corresponding getter is getDeclaredFields() (to make it distinguishable
from getAllFields()).
For now I will create a method getFields() and document that this is the
same
as getDeclaredFields().
I was just being curious.
On a side note: I think it will be quite difficult to add something (e.g. a
new
method parser) to Clazz without a very good documentation.
Regards
Victor
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
