On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > > We've done this on James, as well. However, we consider more than CVS > > commits in terms of activity. And in the one case where someone was > > mistakenly listed because of a lack of CVS commits, despite being active on > > the mailing list, he complained. And rightly so. > > Right on. The act of complaining alone makes one "active". > > This isn't kicking anyone out, it's just removing CVS access to avoid > giving the impresssion that there are 70+ people actively making changes > to the jakarta-commons CVS tree, when more that 20% of those people > haven't made any commits.
Correction: "haven't made any commits in at least a year." > > I'm more than happy to acknowledge any sort of activity as making one an > active committer. In fact, simply indicating that one would like to be > considered an active committer is more than enough for me. > > If someone who hasn't made any commits in a year would like to retain > access anyway, just say so. If we remove access now and such a person > would later like to have access once again, just say so. "Emeritus > committer" is the same as "committer", except for what's listed in the > avail file (the thing that will tell you don't have sufficient "karma" > to commit to the repository). A simple post to the list will get one > added back into that list. This is an entirely reversible action. > > > --- Noel > > - Rod <http://radio.weblogs.com/0122027/> > -- - Rod <http://radio.weblogs.com/0122027/> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
